Inappropriate to use DAVID for initial de novo characterization

now going to work with

this file created 5/2/111
Galaxy127-[Join_two_Datasets_on_data_5_and_data_120].tabular.zip

made a file for process only
will go with 1.00E-05 (or less than 1.00E-04)

23702 contigs had SPID - GO Process
. 57
cell adhesion 519
cell cycle and proliferation 1217
cell organization and biogenesis 1825
cell-cell signaling 58
death 545
developmental processes 1445
DNA metabolism 1242
other biological processes 3272
other metabolic processes 7461
protein metabolism 2647
RNA metabolism 3866
signal transduction 1136
stress response 1539
transport 6473 
** note did not graph Others

--AAAAAAHHHHHHHHH! this really is double check! 



follow up on SPSS




RNA-seq

46 genes were only expressed in Laby library
(note have minimally 15 hits)

78 only in control 
(note have at min 14 hits)


270 greater than 4 fold in Laby

255 greater than 4 fold in Control 

--
503 total p value less than .05
of those there were 215 SPIDs

235 up in Laby
268 up in control

There are a total of 90 with associated GO slim terms for BP

--
31357 unique SPID in total 90230 contigs



SeaFanDiFF05.xlsx<<<<<<<<<<_____________











DAVID
0.5 genes and SP of denovo

SeafanGOallDAVID.txt

only took <0.05 to revigo

revigo output
REViGO.csv

only ones signficantly enriched.



pathogenesis
path.txt



defense response

reponse to biotic stimulus



response to bacterium



anotmical structure morphogenesis




PICKING out the cool ones
the hook as they say


Q9UGM3
Q4A0V8
 Q5SC59
 Q9JHA8
 O95786
 P34053
 P00720
 Q90593
 P81783
 P11407
 O60449 
seafanHOT.xlsx


issue is that evalues are bad

DAVID
Functional Annotation Clustering
Sea
SeafanFAC.txt


Pathway 





FUNCTIONAL ANNOTATION TABLE

SeafanFAT.txt